Real Estate Developer Claims There May Be No Blacks Residents Left In San Francisco In 10 Years

Get The Scoop Weekly On Southeast Queens. Subscribe to Our Mailing List. Receive the Latest Events, News, Jobs, and Top Community Economic Development Stories Like this one Click Here

Sponsored Editorial By Anna Kihagi

-------

THERE MIGHT BE NO BLACK RESIDENTS IN SAN FRANCISCO IN 10 YEARS!

"BLACK LIVES DO NOT MATTER IN SAN FRANCISCO"

Real Estate Investor Anna Kihagi Takes On The City Of San Francisco

The sad story that is not being heard risks a catastrophic result.  For years, the black community has been vocal about the City’s prejudiced treatment of black tenants and business owners.  What used to be once a thriving and prominent community, that could rival Harlem in Jazz and entertainment, has steadily been eroded. The biggest culprit of cultural demolition has been the City of San Francisco itself.

In 1970, blacks made up 13% of the San Francisco population; today, it’s closer to 3% – and shrinking quickly:

“My prediction is 10 years from now, we won’t have 20,000 blacks in this city.” - Rev. Amos C. Brown, pastor of Third Baptist Church, a historically black church founded in 1852.

California Black Landlord Forced to Pay $2.5 Million

Get The Scoop Weekly On Southeast Queens. Subscribe to Our Mailing List. Receive the Latest Events, News, Jobs, and Top Community Economic Development Stories Like this one Click Here

-------

LANDLORD ANNA KIHAGI FORCED TO PAY $2.5 MILLION AFTER CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNFAIRLY CHANGED THE LAW DURING HER PENDING CASE

Real Estate Investor Ann Kihagi

Nationwide -- "Government should never be allowed to play tricks with laws as this would completely endanger our American legal system. Yet the City of San Francisco's behavior is very suspect in this regard - the city changed a key law during a pending case that allowed it to win key aspects and millions" asserts Anna Kihagi.

The timing of their sudden change in law makes it suspicious that the intent was to sabotage Ms. Anna Kihagi's defense. She had already won a critical motion in March 2016, and the rulings in that case and smart arguments made by her solo Vietnamese attorney must have confounded the City's five attorneys.

By the time the City filed its case, the alleged "violations" had either already been resolved or were created by tenants' City-inspired efforts to flood the DBI; tenants even bragged that these complaints didn't matter but were being made to harass Ms. Kihagi.


Judge Angela Bradstreet therefore imposed over $2.5 million in fees for supposed violations that had "already been abated" not to mention they were fighting about failing to get permits to remodel kitchens and bathrooms similar to what 80% of other landlords do, and of course, no cases are filed against those other landlords.